Kitchen render review workflow

Beautiful output.A safer approval path.

ARQ compares each AI-enhanced render with the original design image, flags possible changes automatically, and keeps comments, retries, accepted issues, and final approval attached to the room.

Review a live room Read the checklist

Automatic QA supports review. A person still makes the final decision.

ARQ design review board showing a client room, version history, comments, and review activity.

Before client useSource and history stay visible

Final decisionHuman approval required

CompareAttempt against original design

FlagPossible changes automatically

DecideRetry, reject, or accept an issue

ApproveOnly when suitable for client use

Why review matters

An impressive render can still be commercially wrong.

A render can look impressive while still changing important design details. ARQ automatically checks the result against the original design and keeps any possible changes visible so a responsible reviewer can approve, override, or request another attempt. The same process works across kitchens, bedrooms, bathrooms, fitted furniture, and wider interiors.

Automatic QA before approval

ARQ checks the layout, fitted elements, products, colours, openings, and camera framing against the original design.

Comments in context

Keep feedback attached to the render attempt rather than scattered across email, chat, and file names.

Approve or retry

Make the next action explicit: approve, retry, accept a known issue, reject, or continue editing.

Responsible decisions

Designed for clear sign-off.

ARQ review boards help the person responsible for quality understand the full render story: original design image, generated output, QA notes, attempts, comments, and approval state.

See the original design image, generated output, QA notes, attempts, comments, and current approval state.
Keep accepted overrides visible instead of silently discounting the review history.
Move approved work into a shared library for the showroom team.

ARQ desktop review state showing an original bedroom design image, polished attempt, automatic QA checks, and approval controls. — Actual ARQ review statePossible changes are visible before approval

Claims discipline

A safer workflow is an honest workflow.

What ARQ does

Surfaces possible changes for review.

Compares the generated attempt with the original design
Keeps QA context beside the approval decision
Records retries, rejections, and accepted issues

What ARQ does not claim

Automatic perfection.

No guarantee that every changed detail will be detected
No removal of professional judgement
No silent approval on behalf of the designer

Review details

Review workflow questions

What should a kitchen render review confirm?

ARQ checks for possible changes to layout, cabinet runs, appliance placement, worktops, colours, windows, and camera angle. The reviewer uses those flags alongside the client brief to make the final approval decision.

Can a designer manually accept a flagged render?

Yes. Manual QA override means the designer accepts the flagged attempt. That state should remain visible so the team understands the decision.

Does review slow the team down?

The goal is the opposite: make review faster and clearer by putting attempts, QA notes, comments, and approval state in one place.

Continue exploring

Use your own design

Would ARQ make your sign-off clearer?

A pilot is the clearest way to assess output quality, automatic QA, approval confidence, and whether ARQ fits your production process.

Start free pilot